7:41 PM
ARM, cost, cpu, dlooar, HD, ICS, memory, microSD card, multitouch screen, nexus 7, price, technology, U.S, wifi, XOPC, XPAD
Remember the XOPC? That mythical tablet was created in India and considered the cheapest in the world due to its price of only $ 35. Now say, does anyone know Simmtronics? Probably not, but that's not important. The important thing here is that this company has made the Android tablet cheapest in the world, the XPad, which costs only $ 81 U.S. dollars.
Despite its low price, yet the device has component technology base: an ARM CPU 8, multitouch screen, 4GB of memory and WiFi. It plans to focus sales on the East and Southeast Asia, but could also launch a version for students in the Middle East. The XPad
be sold in sizes 7, 8, 9, 9.7 and 10 inches, in addition, each version
will run on Android 4.0 ICS and will support full HD video playback. If you expand the memory of XPad, you can use a microSD card.
A tablet of $ $ 81 makes even the new Nexus 7, $ 200 seems expensive, right?
If you are a coffee addict and like to take the drink even when you are driving, then the Fiat 500L should be your next car. Besides having a glass roof and 6 different engines to choose from, the new car 5 seats have integrated a pot created by the Italian company Lavazza. This kit, called the Coffee Experience
and lies between the front seats, is connected to the vehicle battery
has its own coffee cups, spoons, a container for sugar and a machine for
preparing espresso dispenser also of caffeine.
Unfortunately, the Fiat 500L with integrated Coffee Experience will come only in the U.S., but surely through eBay Could we get the kit, estimated to cost about $ 300.
Briss Colin
Judge, Patent Court of the Superior Court of Justice in London, rejected
the complaint filed by Apple against Samsung Electronics in finding
that the tablets of the South Korean company "are not as cool" as the
U.S. multinational, therefore not be infringed the design right.
As stated in the judgment, which includes Europe Press, although
Samsung Galaxy tablets "are very, very similar" in design to the Apple
iPad "are not identical", so "do not infringe the registered design "by
the company on the block.
Briss notes that Samsung devices are characterized by a "general
simplicity," although "not so extreme" like Apple's designs, so that "an
informed user is not merely that the Galaxy tablets look like a version
finest (the iPhone) but she looks like a different product. "
"The overall impression of an informed user is that the front part of a
family that includes the design of Apple and Samsung are the products
of very fine, almost insubstantial members of the same family with
unusual details in the back. They have the same extreme simplicity of
the design of Apple, not so cool. The overall impression is different,
"argued the judge.
For this reason, the judge rejected the claims Briss Apple to declare
that the tablets Galaxy 10.1, 8.9 and 7.7 of Samsung infringed her right
to the design.
