Showing posts with label permission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label permission. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Pregnancies were advertised on Facebook

 http://i.imgur.com/nV62h.jpg

Infobae. - With the new update of Facebook can not just announce that the family will grow, but it is also possible to specify the due date and if it's child.
The pregnancy will be part of the bar of "Celebrations", which also include birthdays and anniversaries. To incorporate the profile must be selected in the state labeled "Significant Events". And on the tab "Family & Relationships" is clicked "Birth of a child."

Recently, the platform sat the option of marriage between gay couples. Moreover, since it has long been considering the possibility of opening the network to those under 13 years with the permission and supervision of parents. 

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Google tries to finish things off against the project to digitize books

company

Again, the Google went to court to try to end an action in facing the Authors Guild, the largest organization lobbying on behalf of writers in the United States, which accuses the company has scanned millions of books for your project Google Books without ask permission, nor compensate their authors. The news agency is Reuters .

The Google claims that its project, which hopes to build the largest digital library in the world, represents a 'fair use' ('fair use') works, and therefore should not pay royalties. Since the organization of writers seeks $ 125 million to yield an agreement, which was denied by a federal judge.

The agreement was rejected by Judge Denny Chin, who considered that the approval of the partnership could mean a green light to the monopoly of the Silicon Valley company in the area of ​​digitizing books.

The company claims that more than 20 million scanned books in English and posted excerpts of about 4 million, and it was only possible thanks to an agreement with the country's large public libraries. Many of the books are still protected by copyright but are out of print for many years, so the Google claims that it is fair to scan them at no charge to authors.

In the lawsuit filed in a court in Manhattan, Google said that the provision of works - which can be searched internally - without prejudice to the authors, but helps in the dissemination of books, many of which are completely forgotten by society.

"The Google Books creates enormous and positive transformations and by no means reduces the value of the work of the authors, "the lawsuit says.

And you, what do you think?