Showing posts with label best processor for gaming 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best processor for gaming 2011. Show all posts

Friday, August 17, 2012

The best gaming processor 2011

 The best gaming processor 2011 AMD or Intel

It is well known that experiences each one has a preference for a processor or another.

But why?

Surely this pross will say that I had no problems, or that if I ran this or that game and it does not .. etc etc ..

Then today I come to bring a bit of info from each and a bit of comparison ...

Note: This post is approximate. I do not create controversies ... and if you come here for those chances to nail red arrow .. Think about it twice ..

And as some say, "No one is born knowing" .. this would work for anyone ..."The best gaming processor 2011"

The processor market is shared, first and foremost, between two manufacturers. The first is nothing more and nothing less than Intel, a U.S. company that invented the microprocessor in the early '70s. The other without diminishing reputation is AMD (Advanced Micro Devices), another U.S. company with a long history that tube the prestige of being the first to launch a 1 GHz microprocessor and also, chips of 64 nits for home users. A third is the Taiwanese manufacturer VIA. This company makes chips compatible with the socket of the old Pentium III (socket 370), but these products are very particular in South America, and currently are not competitive as far as performance is concerned, but are distinguished by having a very low power consumption and low temperature operation.

The best gaming processor 2011 In the lower price range you can find processors that have been specially designed to provide an affordable option, low cost, compared to more expensive mics. These are: Intel celeron: it is derived from the architecture of the Pentium 4, which come with less cache and less velocidad.Hay two models of Celeron socket 478 compatible: the older (available up to 2.8 GHz) using a 400 MHz bus and 128 KB cache, and its performance leaves something to be desired. The most recent use Celeron D uses a 533 MHz bus and 256 KB of cache, which markedly improved its performance compared to previous verions.

The last to come Celeron socket 775 and supports 64-bit, making them more desirable than the others and suitable for multiple uses. AMD Sempron (Socket A) processors that can be used with older motherboards and Socket A. The Sempron model number is compared to the Celeron. Thus, the performance of a Sempron 2400 + would equivañlente approximately a 2.4 Celeron GHz.Debido to micro and mothers Socket A and are ceasing to be manufactured and performance have been overcome, we will not recommend building a PC new to this platform, unless that price is a gift from God. AMD Sempron (Socket 754): These are variants of the Athlon Sempron 64 with less cache. The latest versions support 64-bit instructions and SSE3 (eye, because the market is still encuetran Semprons of only 32 bits). For its speed and price are a great choice for gamers without much budget (without a morlaco in his pocket, he).

These flagship processors micros offer more performance and conform to the demands of gamers and professionals who need a lot of power calculation. Intel Pentium 4: This is the flagship of Intel and is available in a wide range of models that differ by the speed of operation, from 2.26 GHz to 3.5 GHz over formats are Socket 478 Socket 775 and . The faster and more recent models are based on the core "Prescott", which incorporates 1 MB of cache and multimedia instruction SSE3.Para the power-hungry, Intel has succulent dishes: line 600 of the Pentium 4 supports 64-bit software, and line 800 provides dual-core processors, which combine two processing cores on a single core, Quad core too, only instead of two cores esots have 4, and soon we will all eight cores. Intel Xeon: are variants of the Pentium 4 with more cache and guaranteed to run in parallel multiprocessing server roles and work stations. AMD Athlon 64: the processor 32/64 bit comes in two formats, which are Socket 754 and Socket 939.

The latter integrates a memory controller Dual channel (dual channel). The model names indicate their level of performance. For example, Athlon 64 3200 + would be equivalent to a Pentium 4 3.2-GHz.La version of the Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core is espcially suited to multitasking funcoines where they perform simultaneous load. For example, allows the compression of video while running a game. All this without affecting the speed of the various operations. AMD Athlon 64 FX is the higher performance variant of AMD. It is available in both Socket 939 or 940, and is characterized by the large size of the cache and faster. Opteron: This 64-bit processor fits into the socket 940 and requires the use of ECC memory. Sold for servers and workstations. It can operate in parallel processing configurations (multiple processors in a single mother).

The best gaming processor 2011 in PC ?

For those who want a single PC, and that its function is to surf the Internet, burn CDs or DVDs, send emails, listen to music or watch a video, the most recommended would be for the line AMD Sempron models, and INTEL , the CELERON D.

These processors correspond to the economic line of their respective manufacturers, and has a very good performance for home jobs.

For the more demanding (GAMES)

Here and recommend spending a higher performance microprocessors, such as the AMD Athlon, or Intel HT, which means the software can execute two instructions simultaneously.

These processors usually have a higher price than the Sempron AMD or INTEL CELERON.

And if not enough ...

... We have the new dual-core microprocessors. These processors have the advantage of having built two microprocessors in one, ie for example: INTEL PENTIUM D 840, with dual processors of 3.2 GHz (gigahertz), each, and a cache of 1 MB for each , or the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600 +.

For more power, there are currently microprocessor with four or eight cores, but are expensive.

Most important to note that these comparisons may not be sufficient, is that the line AMD has a structure for the vector design, allowing you to have the highest yields in multimedia, graphic design and obviously in games, line while Intel is best for those who need to perform mathematical processes, or editing and compiling programs.
Both processors fulfill all functions well, but if we want the best performance, Let us note to the model we know that was designed specifically for that function.

The best gaming processor 2011 AMD or Intel ?

the brand best known and most places in the TV commercial is NOT always the BEST OPTION. Intel is the brand better known and better respected by consumers and rightly so because it has the best processor of the moment.

The Intel Core i7 3.47GHz 990X of the processor is considered the best performance over all others. For those who do not know much about it I tell you that Intel has already taken several Core i7, what differentiates one from another is the given clock speed in GHz (the bigger the number the better).

But AMD (the direct rival of Intel) is not far behind as it defends Phenom II processors. Q Like Intel, AMD also has several Phenom II processors. To these the difference not only the clock speed but also the number of cores. Not the same a Phenom II X4 a X6. The X4 means it has 4 cores, the X6 has 6 cores. The best processor for the moment, AMD is the Phenom II X6 1100T 3.4GHz Black Edition which is cheaper in cost compared to an Intel i7 in the same efficiency.

Both Intel i7 as AMD Phenom II X6 6-core processors are physical and logical 6, the Intel Core i7 990X with 32-nm manufacturing and Phenom II X6 1100T with 45 nm manufacturing

Here is a ranking of the The best gaming processor 2011 in the market and its price in U.S. dollars:

The best gaming processor 2011 score
The best gaming processor 2011 score

 The best gaming processor 2011 score

 The best gaming processor 2011 score

 The best gaming processor 2011 score
  

Note: Prices change constantly
It should be noted that this ranking did not invent what I or anyone else, this ranking is made using thousands of samples using different performance tests.

Well ... You see the best of Intel surpasses the best of AMD. However if we do a cost / benefit ratio we get:



 processor/benefits table of intel and amd

 processor/benefits table of intel and amd

 processor/benefits table of intel and amd

 processor/benefits table of intel and amd


In the graph above we can realize that AMD processors give us a better cost benefit. With a little thought and deducting the graphs we can conclude that if we want a very good processor for a low cost, then we can choose to buy an AMD. Now if what you want is the best processor and the budget does not bother you your choice most recommended is an Intel i7.

Hope you like this post has been helpful, I will try to update it constantly with new developments and the emerging questions and comments.